Syndication

martedì 6 dicembre 2016

Video su intervento di L. Hardell alla Royal Society of Medicine in London.

qui il link 

OSHA lancia grido d'allarme per i lavoratori addetti alle antenne

Il ministero federale americano per la sicurezza dei lavoratori lanciano un grido d'allarme per le morti professionali da loro riportati per gli operatori addetti alla installazione e manutenzione delle antenne dei cellulari  Preoccupazione è per i lavori programmati per la 5G.

vedere qui 

venerdì 2 dicembre 2016

Perché i governi non ci proteggono ?

Importante articolo di Magda Havas sulla qualificata rivista americana, Environmental Pollution, in cui affronta in modo logico e consequenziale perché il governo (USA, ma anche tutti gli altri) non ci protegge dalle radiofrequenze anche se la ricerca mostra la relazione con il cancro.


L'articolo (ri)propone un molto probabile meccanismo d'azione legato alla creazione di radical liberi a causa di microonde, a valori ben inferiori dei limiti oggi fissati dai governi.
C'è nutrita evidenzia scientifica che avvalora questa ipotesi che vede centrale il ruolo dei radicali liberi.

I governi purtroppo basano le loro linee guida su un ragionamento sbagliato: è acquisito che le radiazioni ionizzanti (es. raggi X) provocano la uscita dell'elettrone a livello atomico portando a modifiche della struttura cellulare, e quindi al cancro. Le radiazioni non-ionizzanti come la radiofrequenze non estraggono l'elettrone, per cui ... non sono cancerogene!
In altre parole le radiazioni ionizzanti provocano la formazione di radicali liberi direttamente, mentre le non-ionizzanti lo fanno ma indirettamente, perché intervengono riducendo o bloccando  i meccanismi di autoriparazione interni alla struttura cellulare, portando quindi ad un potenziamento dello effetto dei radicali liberi.







WHEN THEORY AND OBSERVATION COLLIDE: CAN NON-IONIZING RADIATION CAUSE CANCER?

November 29, 2016:  The Missing Link:  Why your government isn’t protecting you from mobile phones and Wi-Fi when research shows this radiation causes cancer.
The American scientific journal, Environmental Pollution, reports in its next issue that government safety guidelines for microwave radiation emitted by mobile phones, Wi-Fi, smart meters, and other common wireless devices, are fundamentally flawed and fail to protect the public from this possible carcinogen.


Highlights
This paper presents a highly probable mechanism that involves an increase in free-radicals, which–in turn–explains the increased risk of cancers documented in epidemiological studies that are associated with environmental exposure to RFR and ELF EMFs at levels well below international guidelines.
•  There is sufficient scientific evidence of cellular damage caused by non-ionizing radiation (NIR) well below thermal guidelines.
•  Applying the ionization model to NIR is inappropriate as mechanisms of biological interactions differ.
•  Free radicals can and do cause cancer and NIR can and does increase free-radicals.

Scientific evidence increasingly shows wireless radiation causes cancer and infertility and other health effects, but due to a flawed assumption in safety guidelines, governments in the United States, Canada, and the UK (and many other countries) are allowing their citizens to be overexposed to microwave radiation from wireless technology.
Why?
Because governments relied on the wrong model when declaring these devices to be safe.
Ionizing radiation such as x-rays and gamma rays are known to cause cancer by detaching the negative ion – the electron – at the heart of human cell structure.  Non-ionizing radiation, such as microwaves, do not detach electrons. Therefore when determining whether microwave-emitting devices were safe to be sold to the public, governments formulated their consumer safety guidelines with the understanding that microwave radiation does not directly or immediately discharge electrons. Despite the growing number of scientific studies documenting that microwave radiation causes cancer, governments have refused to update their guidelines.
One critical aspect of non-ionizing radiation has been overlooked.
Ionizing radiation increases free radicals in the body directly.  Non-ionizing radiation increases free radicals in the body indirectly, by interfering with repair mechanisms that neutralize free radicals.  Free radicals are carcinogenic.  Therefore by interfering with the body’s ability to repair free radical damage, microwave radiation is also carcinogenic.
Microwave radiation was used in the 1940s for military radar, and was widely adopted for civilian residential use in the 1970s to cook food. Microwave ovens (originally called radar ranges) are shielded because microwaves are known to cause heating. At that time, it was assumed that the only danger from microwave exposure was tissue heating, known as the “thermal effect”. This led to thermal guidelines for microwave radiation.
This paper shines a spotlight on the misguided genesis of government regulations that are based on the thermal effect and documents free-radical damage induced by non-ionizing radiation.
As usage of microwave–emitting devices increases and is marketed to younger consumers without caution, we can expect a societal increase of certain types of cancers including gliomas as well as infertility and other health effects associated with free-radical damage.  Indeed this is already happening.

Havas, M.  2016.  When theory and observation collide:  Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer?  Environmental Pollution (in press).
Abstract
This paper attempts to resolve the debate about whether non-ionizing radiation (NIR) can cause cancer–a debate that has been ongoing for decades. The rationale, put forward mostly by physicists and accepted by many health agencies, is that, “since NIR does not have enough energy to dislodge electrons, it is unable to cause cancer.” This argument is based on a flawed assumption and uses the model of ionizing radiation (IR) to explain NIR, which is inappropriate. Evidence of free-radical damage has been repeatedly documented among humans, animals, plants and microorganisms for both extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (EMF) and for radio frequency (RF) radiation, neither of which is ionizing. While IR directly damages DNA, NIR interferes with the oxidative repair mechanisms resulting in oxidative stress, damage to cellular components including DNA, and damage to cellular processes leading to cancer. Furthermore, free-radical damage explains the increased cancer risks associated with mobile phone use, occupational exposure to NIR (ELF EMF and RFR), and residential exposure to power lines and RF transmitters including mobile phones, cell phone base stations, broadcast antennas, and radar installations.

martedì 29 novembre 2016

conferenza su elettrosmog il 15.12 a Monte Porzio Catone (RM)


 
 
 
 
Vi invito alla conferenza su “Elettrosmog: i rischi per l'Uomo e per l'ambiente”, che si terrà all'Osservatorio di Roma, Frascati, giovedì 15 dicembre 2016 ore 17.00.
Ci saranno, oltre a me, il Dott. Fiorenzo Marinelli e il Dott. Antonio Maria Pasciuto a parlare di rischi per la salute correlati a cellulari, Wi-Fi, elettrosmog in genere.
La locandina è allegata.
Cordiali saluti,
Francesca
 
Francesca Romana Orlando
Vice Presidente di AMICA
www.infoamica.it
amica@infoamica.it

venerdì 25 novembre 2016

Il Regista del nuovo film SENSIBILE a Radio24

Carissimi domani mattina,  26.11.16,  alle 9:30 intervento del nostro regista Alessandro Quadretti sul documentario "Sensibile".

E' una grande opportunità vista la diffusione del network a livello nazionale.

mercoledì 23 novembre 2016

Petizione ad Obama per pubblicizzazione di dati del governo

Vi invitiamo a firmare questa petizione che chiede al Presidente Obama di rendere pubblici i dati dello importante studio condotto dalla agenzia federale U.S. National Toxicology Program 


Sono stati pubblicati alcune sintesi ... molto tranquillizzanti ...

rinviano continuamente la pubblicazione di tutti i dati:  come mai ?

link da clickare

giovedì 17 novembre 2016

In arrivo la 5G in USA: prevista un antenna ogni 12 case !!!




5G in the US:  a cell  antenna for every 12 homes 
From David Morrison:
See letter below from:   Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director
Center for Family and Community Health School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley Electromagnetic Radiation Safety

Urgent Action: Please call or write your city, county &/or State politicians and OCT offices advising them to refuse revision to cell tower siting rules. Industry will be introducing 5G next year and requesting cities allow them to install A CELL ANTENNA FOR EVERY 12 HOMES. 5G frequency has many potential agendas. This is the same frequency used with airport scanners and has vast surveillance potential as well as other military applications in civilian populations. 5G is unnecessary and even the F.B.I. Warns Against It !! !! It will lead to more sickness and death while industry makes trillions and trillions of dollars. World Health Organization Dr. Anthony Miller, M.D. warns against it. !!
Fwd: Take Action: States and municipalities - Wireless radiation carcinogenic
Everyone,

Telecom has begun their PR on 5G, asking the public to contact their city council to streamline their regulations to allow swift deployment of small cell sites in their cities. Please see email at bottom from Dr. Joel Moskowitz which shows a letter written by the wireless industry appearing in the San Francisco Chronicle.
NOW is the time for action - there has never been a greater need for everyone to write letters, inform, and meet with their political representatives. If we don't inform our local governments and our neighbors about the truth regarding what is coming with 5G in the imminent future, who will? Telecom is selling the public on 5G with its speed and cool tech, but the public does not know that 5G was never tested (along with, 4G, 3G, 2G) for long-term health effects and that this would mean one tower per 12 homes.
Only through public awareness of the risks and unknowns around wireless technology and knowledge of people who have been harmed will there be change.
Please see email below from Catherine of electricalpollution.com. She gives excellent instructions on how/what to do, including letter templates.
Dr. Joel Moskowitz is asking people to write letters to the editors at San Francisco Chronicle - see his email for instructions.

Please make time to contact your elected officials and do som